THE POWER OF NATURE - Homeopathy Cures You in Amsterdam, Laren, Hilversum, Bussum, Blaricum, Eemnes, Naarden, Huizen
  • THE POWER OF NATURE - Homeopathy Cures You
  • Classic Homeopathy and Orthomolecular Therapy : The winning combination!
  • Natural Recovery and Scientific Prove
  • Why do we get sick + Remedies
  • For which illnesses + tarifs + reimbursement
    • Behandelvoorwaarden en praktijkinformatie
  • Blog

The Australian Report

2/9/2019

 
The Australian report

You can read this report directly on  :
https://www.hri-research.org/resources/homeopathy-the-debate/the-australian-report-on-homeopathy/?fbclid=IwAR250kBgyE2k87nUCWyh7hHTgxM0eInKGMw_pRtTkZkf745iAXguZqTw8OI

In March 2015, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) published an Information Paper on homeopathy, commonly referred to as ‘The Australian Report’.1
This document concluded that “…there are no health conditions for which there is reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective”.
The report triggered headlines around the world suggesting NHMRC had found that homeopathy does not work for any condition.3
However, on 26 August 2019 NHMRC CEO Prof Anne Kelso provided the following clarification on the findings of the 2015 Homeopathy Review:
“Contrary to some claims, the review did not conclude that homeopathy was ineffective.”
An extensive investigation by the Australian Homeopathic Association (AHA) into NHMRC’s conduct, combined with an in-depth scientific analysis of the review by HRI, revealed evidence of serious procedural and scientific misconduct, including the fact that the published report was NHMRC’s second attempt – a first report written in 2012 was never disclosed to the public.
Missing first report finally released
After an ongoing campaign by stakeholders and the general public, in August 2019 NHMRC finally released the draft 2012 report in which the author concluded that there is “encouraging evidence for the effectiveness of homeopathy” in five medical conditions.

Australian Report key facts
  • NHMRC did the homeopathy review twice, producing two reports, one in July 2012 and the one released to the public in March 2015.
  • The existence of the first report was not disclosed to the public – it was only discovered through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.
  • NHMRC say they rejected the first report because it was poor quality despite it being undertaken by a reputable scientist and author of NHMRC’s own guidelines on how to conduct evidence reviews.
  • FOI requests have revealed that a member of NHMRC’s expert committee overseeing the review process – Professor Fred Mendelsohn – confirmed the first review to be high quality saying –  “I am impressed by the rigor, thoroughness and systematic approach given to this evaluation [….] Overall, a lot of excellent work has gone into this review and the results are presented in a systematic, unbiased and convincing manner.” 
  • NHMRC said the results of the second report published in 2015 were based on a “rigorous assessment of over 1800 studies”. In fact results were based on only 176 studies.
  • NHMRC used a method that has never been used in any other review, before or since. NHMRC decided that for trials to be ‘reliable’ they had to have at least 150 participants and reach an unusually high threshold for quality. This is despite the fact that NHMRC itself routinely conducts studies with less than 150 participants.
  • These unprecedented and arbitrary rules meant the results of 171 of the trials were completely disregarded as being ‘unreliable’ leavingonly 5 trials NHMRC considered to be ‘reliable’. As they assessed all 5 of these trials as negative, this explains how NHMRC could conclude that there was no ‘reliable’ evidence.
  • Professor Peter Brooks, Chair of the NHMRC committee that conducted the 2015 review, signed conflict of interest formdeclaring he was not “affiliated or associated with any organisation whose interests are either aligned with or opposed to homeopathy”,despite being a member of anti-homeopathy lobby group ‘Friends of Science in Medicine’
  • NHMRC’s guidelines state that such committees must include experts on the topic being reviewed, yet there was not one homeopathy expert on this committee.
Complaint submitted to Commonwealth Ombudsman
In August 2016 HRI’s in-depth scientific analysis was used as part of a submission of complaint to the Commonwealth Ombudsman brought by Complementary Medicines Australia, Australian Homoeopathic Association and Australian Traditional Medicine Society.
An initial assessment found the complaint to be of sufficient merit to warrant a full investigation into NHMRC’s conduct. Over the intervening months, this process has involved ongoing input from both parties as NHMRC answers charges of bias, conflict of interest and scientific misconduct.
Download the Executive Summary of the Ombudsman submission here.
Rachel Roberts, HRI Chief Executive says, “NHMRC’s review is a shocking example of misreporting. Decision-makers and the scientific community rely on these kinds of reports and need to trust their accuracy. This is not about anyone’s personal opinion as to whether homeopathy works or not. It is about the importance of evidence being reported objectively, whatever it says, and NHMRC did not do that.”
As the complaint is ongoing, our full analysis – some 60 pages – cannot be shared as yet, but HRI’s data provided details demonstrating the following scientific failures by NHMRC which necessitate retraction of the Australian Report:
  • Use of an inappropriate scientific method
  • Failure to use standardised, accepted methods
  • Failure to obtain sufficiently accurate data to perform a meaningful review
  • Failure to conduct an effective preliminary and public consultation
  • Significant post-hoc changes to the research protocol
  • Impact of NHMRC’s unusual method on the review results
  • Further evidence of bias and misreporting
  • Poor reporting – lack of clarity, inconsistencies and errors
  • Evidence that this was a case of deliberate bias, not scientific error.
Dr Alex Tournier, Executive Director of HRI, explains: “The inaccuracies in NHMRC’s report are so extreme that we decided to work with the AHA to conduct a thorough investigation to fully uncover exactly what went on.”
The complainants are now waiting to hear back from the Ombudsman regarding their submission. As NHMRC’s inaccurate Homeopathy Review has had a significant impact on the field of homeopathy research worldwide, HRI will share any news regarding the complaint as the case progresses.
Roberts says: “The public has a right to know that there are high quality studies showing homeopathy works for some medical conditions, such as hay fever, sinusitis and diarrhoea in children – information that was lost only due to NHMRC’s mishandling of the evidence. If the evidence on conventional medicine was treated this way there would be an outcry – and rightly so. NHMRC’s job was to accurately summarise the body of evidence for homeopathy for the public, a task in which they categorically failed.”
The missing first report
NHMRC’s investigation into Homeopathy ran from 2010 to 2015. NHMRC initially worked with an external contractor at the University of South Australia (UniSA) – from April 2012-August 2012 – to produce a review of the evidence on Homeopathy to inform the Australian public.
The report produced was called The Effectiveness of Homeopathy: An overview review of secondary evidence.
This review, paid for by Australian tax payers, was never made public and NHMRC refused to release it for over three years, despite repeated Freedom of Information requests.
After terminating the contract with the first review team, a second external contractor – OptumInsight – was hired to do the Homeopathy review again from December 2012-March 2015.
HRI is not alone in criticising the accuracy of NHMRC’s findings
FOI requests have brought to light that two independent experts also raised concerns over the conclusions of the 2015 report during peer review, prior to final publication. The Australasian Cochrane Centre commented that for some conditions, “…. ‘no reliable evidence’ does not seem an accurate reflection of the body of evidence”; a second expert felt “uncertain of the definitive nature of the Report’s conclusions”. NHMRC chose not to act on this feedback and did not amend their conclusions.
The real story behind the headlines
More
Contrary to NHMRC’s findings, there are ‘good quality, well-designed studies with enough participants for a meaningful result‘ (to use NHMRC’s description of a reliable study) which show that certain homeopathic treatments are effective for certain conditions such as hay fever, sinusitis, upper respiratory tract infections, diarrhoea in children and lower back pain. The fact that the results of such studies were unjustifiably dismissed means that NHMRC have misled the public by misreporting the evidence for effectiveness of homeopathy.


Research over vaccins

7/12/2018

 
Dana Hamed-Ramadan is een medisch studente die in opdracht van haar professor onderzoek heeft gedaan naar wetenschappelijke publicaties over vaccinatieschade. Zij kwam met een indrukwekkende lijst.


U kunt haar publicatie direct of dit web site lezen :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10GHQRVhjXTg-jUFfmJ5TrhmbwmGihQD8qWk8hvlwftc/mobilebasic?fbclid=IwAR1J5J480i-qFkmvFtmno8tU9-Z5-CpSL4eWQT7TvWRoI25gRiE2zJfSQzQ
 
 
This is all of the research I have collected proving vaccinations to be harmful. ALL OF THESE STUDIES ARE PUBLISHED, LEGITIMATE STUDIES ON PUBMED which is a government database.
Vaccines and Autism 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092

Causal relationship between vaccine induced immunity and autism
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12849883

Subtle DNA changes and the overuse of vaccines in autism
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/

Vaccine and Autism- a New Scientific Review
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/vaccines-and-autism-a-new-scientific-review/ 

Summary of previous Journal of Immunology
http://danmurphydc.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/AR-10-12-rata-AUTISM-VACCINE.pdf

Autism and Resulting Medical Conditions:
http://www.tacanow.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/autism-studies-april-2008.pdf . 

Mercury toxic encephalopathy manifesting with clinical symptoms of regressive autistic disorders. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560

Relation of mercury to high autism rates in boys
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16264412

Elevated levels of measles in children with Autism
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12849883

Abnormal MMR antibodies in children with autism
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534

Tylenol, MMR and Autism - A parent survey study
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18445737

A Positive Association found between Autism Prevalence and Childhood Vaccination
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tandf/uteh/2011/00000074/00000014/art00002?token=004c170388ee06a6e5865462431636f5720415d23763c247b5e4e26634a492f2530332976261

Peer reviewed study on fetal cell contamination with retro virus associated with autism and cancer
http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-study-in-journal-of-public-health-finds-autism-and-cancer-related-to-human-fetal-dna-in-vaccines/5402912

Study documentation- Dr Deisher
http://www.ms.academicjournals.org/article/article1409245960_Deisher%20et%20al.pdf

Autism and mercury poisoning
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848

Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum disorders
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250

Rise in autism coincides with rise in vaccines
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535

A two-phase study evaluating the relationship between Thimerosal-containing vaccine administration and the risk for an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis in the United States
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/
Elevated levels of measles antibodies in children with autism. - PubMed - NCBI
Pediatr Neurol. 2003 Apr;28(4):292-4. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ·
••••••••••••••••
A study published in the Journal of Biomedical Sciences determined that the autoimmunity to the central nervous system may play a causal role in autism. Researchers discovered that because many autistic children harbour elevated levels of measles antibodies, they should conduct a serological study of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and myelin basic protein (MBP) autoantibodies. They used serum samples of 125 autistic children and 92 controlled children. Their analysis showed a significant increase in the level of MMR antibodies in autistic children. The study concludes that the autistic children had an inappropriate or abnormal antibody response to MMR. The study determined that autism could be a result from an atypical measles infection that produces neurological symptoms in some children. The source of this virus could be a variant of MV, or it could be the MMR vaccine.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534
•••••••••••••••••••
IMPORTANT- 
  • Package inserts: 
    http://www.immunize.org/fda/
  • Ingredients:
    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf
  • Supreme Court declares vaccines unavoidably unsafe:
    https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf
  • National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act legislation (renders manufactures 100% of any & all liability):
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546
  • VAERS:
    https://vaers.hhs.gov/index
  • National Compensation Court website (note the $3 billion paid out comes from tax payers):
    https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/data/
  • Detox baths:
    https://www.howhesraised.net/2016/11/the-beginners-guide-to-detox-baths-for-kids/
  • Vaccine requirements for work/school by state:
    http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx
  • Vit K package insert: 
    https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2003/012223Orig1s039Lbl.pdf
  • People who should not be vaccinated:
https://www.thefamilythathealstogether.com/vaccine-contraindications-six-people-not-vaccinated/
  • Lawsuit determines that federally required safety studies have not been performed in 30 years:
http://icandecide.org/government/ICAN-HHS-Stipulated-Order-July-2018.pdf
Fetal Cells & Vaccine Contaminates-
  • Fetal cells:
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/new-fetal-cell-line-from-live-abortion-emerges-for-vaccine-production/
  • More on fetal cells:
    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=396109597402989&id=272455363101747
  • 20%-36% of cell lines scientists are using are contaminated or misidentified:
    https://www.statnews.com/2016/07/21/studies-wrong-cells/
  • Still going to vaccinate? Let's hope that you are getting real vaccines -- not alcohol & cat saliva! :
    http://www.wandtv.com/story/33272117/doctor-concocts-his-own-vaccines-with-cat-saliva-state-says
  • SV40 cancer virus that infected 98 million Americans in the polio vaccine:
    http://www.sv40foundation.org
  • Development of vaccines from aborted fetuses:
    https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/farnsworthvaccines.pdf
  • DNA mutations from fetal cell lines in vaccines:
    http://soundchoice.org/research/
  • WALVAX2 (fetal cells):
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/25803132/
  • Ethics behind WALVAX2:
http://ethicalresearch.net/positions/the-ethics-of-the-walvax-2-cell-strain/
  • PBS on how vital fetal cells are for vaccine development:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/medical-researchers-say-fetal-tissue-remains-essential
Vaccine Failure & Shedding-
  • Mumps outbreak -- all vaccinated:
    http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57276bc7e4b0b49df6abc402
  • Measles outbreak in a fully immunized school: 
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823
  • Measles outbreak among the vaccinated:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8053748
  • New York measles outbreak linked to vaccinated:
    http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/27/cid.ciu105
  • Vaccinated child responsible for measles outbreak in British Columbia:
    http://www.eurosurveillance.org/images/dynamic/EE/V18N49/art20649.pdf
  • Mumps outbreak in Netherlands linked to those vaccinated:
    http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/4/13-1681_article
  • Vaccinated student in Cali diagnosed with mumps:
    http://www.nbcsandiego.com/on-air/as-seen-on/Cal-State-San-Marcos-Student-Diagnosed-With-Mumps-395189031.html
  • What's shedding? :
    http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2008/02/24/secondary-transmission-%EF%BB%BFthe-short-and-sweet-about-live-virus-vaccine-shedding/comment-page-1/
  • 98% vaccinated in pertussis outbreak: 
    http://www.activistpost.com/2015/02/98-vaccinated-involved-in-whooping.html
  • Vaccine-related polio outbreak in Syria 2017:
    https://www.statnews.com/2017/06/08/polio-outbreak-syria-who/
  • More vaccine failure -- pertussis outbreak in vaccinated children: 
    https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22/2/pdfs/15-0325.pdf
  • Pertussis outbreak in San Diego -- 621 people & 85% were vaccinated -- MORE vaccine failure: 
    http://www.kpbs.org/news/2014/jun/12/immunized-people-getting-whooping-cough/
  • Largest measles epidemic in North America in the last decade occurred in 2011 in Quebec where 1 & 2 dose vaccine coverage among children 3 years of age were 95%-97%:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23264672/
  • Hib outbreak -- 363/443 (82%) were vaccinated: 
    http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/188/4/481.full
  • The Emerging risks of live virus & virus vectored vaccines:
    http://www.nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NVIC/pdf/Live-Virus-Vaccines-and-Vaccine-Shedding.pdf
  • What's shedding? :
    http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2008/02/24/secondary-transmission-%EF%BB%BFthe-short-and-sweet-about-live-virus-vaccine-shedding/comment-page-1/
  • Small Pox vaccine sheds to infant from parent (military personnel):
    http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSN1744524120070518
  • Everyone infected in this whooping cough outbreak was up to date on vaccinations:
    http://fox13now.com/2015/03/27/19-kids-in-summit-co-diagnosed-with-whooping-cough-despite-being-up-to-date-on-vaccinations/
  • & this outbreak too:
    http://myfox8.com/2015/12/18/13-cases-of-whooping-cough-confirmed-in-davie-county-schools/
  • Even the CDC suggests that the vaccinated are an asymptomatic reservoir for infection:
    http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/6/5/00-0512_article
  • Mumps outbreak in Netherlands linked to those vaccinated with the MMR twice: 
    http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/4/13-1681_article
  • Pertussis outbreak in California -
    "Our unvaccinated & undervaccinated population did not appear to contribute significantly to the increased rate of clinical pertussis. Surprisingly, the highest incidence of disease was among previously vaccinated children aged 8–12 years.":
    http://m.cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1730.long?view=long&pmid=22423127
  • Measles outbreak in a fully immunized population: 
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823
  • 49% of children vaccinated STILL got pertussis:
    https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/downloads/pertuss-surv-report-2016-provisional.pdf
  • You may be surprised to learn that fully vaccinated children & adults can still be infected, paralyzed & transmit polio. Here are two cases in particular that may grab your interest- 
  • "Outbreak of paralytic poliomyelitis in Oman: evidence for widespread transmission among fully vaccinated children" :
    http://www.popline.org/node/315407#.dpuf

  •  "Oral polio vaccine-associated paralysis in a child despite previous immunization with inactivated vaccine." :
    http://www.virology.ws/2014/10/08/oral-polio-vaccine-associated-paralysis-in-a-child-despite-previous-immunization-with-inactivated-virus/
  • Mutant strains of polio vaccine now causing more paralysis than wild polio:
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio
  • Polio vaccine causing polio again:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/26/health/polio-papua-new-guinea-bn/index.html
  • Polio vaccine contaminated with HFM virus:
https://healthfreedomidaho.org/polio-vaccine-sheds-hfmd
Stories-
  • Healthy babies don't just die:
    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=415927885421160&id=272455363101747
  • Triplets vaccine injury story:
    https://www.facebook.com/wearevaxxed/videos/354597028220913/
  • Vaccines killed her son:
    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=489700951377186&id=272455363101747
  • A-Z injury stories: 
    http://www.followingvaccinations.com/home
  • Her daughter was killed by her 1 y vaccines:
    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=483522525328362&id=272455363101747
  • The story of Nikie's daughter (be prepared to cry): 
    https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10209935263716989&id=1196380373
  • Colton's story: 
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CHYmb9Hwj4A&feature=share
  • Mom accused of shaking her baby because he suffered from encephalitis due to the DPT vaccine https://www.facebook.com/wearevaxxed/videos/505673969779884/
  • Jess's story:
    https://www.facebook.com/332186880241439/photos/a.332188263574634.1073741826.332186880241439/554864934640298/?type=3
  • Holly died after her kindergarten boosters:
    http://hopefromholly.com/blog/
  • Baby Ian’s story - hep B reaction:
    http://www.iansvoice.org/
  • Baby Aniya was vaccine overdosed: 
    https://www.gofundme.com/62bev-raising-money-for-aniyas-injustice
  • $101 million dollar settlement for an infant that suffered a severe reaction to MMR:
https://www.mctlawyers.com/101-million-dollar-vaccine-injury-mmr/
  • Two, one year olds die immediately after MMR:
https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/world/samoa-recalls-vaccines-after-child-deaths/ar-AAzOvrF?ocid=spartanntp
  • Krystle’s 13.5 month old son passed away the day he received his flu vaccine:
https://www.facebook.com/wearevaxxed/videos/489700951377186/
SIDS-
  • Infanrix lists SIDS as an adverse reaction. Page 12, line 250:
    https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm124514.pdf
  • SIDS:
    https://truthkings.com/dirty-secret-behind-infant-mortality-united-states/#
  • Interesting as the doctor found many SIDS cases to have inflammation &/or infection in the inner ear... & the vaccine inserts I have read have listed "otitis media" (medical term for ear infection) as a possible adverse event:
    http://www.seattlechildrens.org/about/stories/listening-to-a-hunch/
  • Family compensated for SIDS of their 4 m/o son: 
    https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2013vv0611-73-0
  • SIDS DID NOT EXIST BEFORE THE VACCINE PROGRAM STARTED-NOW THE US HAS THE HIGHEST INFANT MORTALITY RATE IN THE INDUSTRIALIZED WORLD TO GO WITH THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF VACCINES GIVEN!!!! 
    http://thinktwice.com/sids.htm
Adverse Reactions/Death-
  • Deaths during Gardasil Trials - 1 in 733 participants in the vaccine trials died.Bottom of page 7 of insert: 
    https://www.fda.gov/.../ApprovedProducts/UCM111263.pdf
  • 213 Women who took Gardasil Suffered Permanent Disability 2012:
    http://articles.mercola.com/.../hpv-vaccine-victim-sues...
  • “The only thing different about that day was that shot...” Did a trip to the doctor kill a healthy 12-year-old girl?:
    http://fox6now.com/.../the-only-thing-different-about.../
  • 150+ deaths reported to VAERS as of June 2017 (Gardasil):
    https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/saved/D8/D17F338
  • Vaccine Injury Court Cases of Death caused by HPV vaccine:
    https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc...
    https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc...

    https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc…
  • Shingles vaccine causes chicken pox, shingles, & eye injuries:
    http://info.cmsri.org/the-driven-researcher-blog/merck-admits-shingles-vaccine-can-cause-eye-damage-and-shingles?utm_content=39146139&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook
  • Fetal death & medical billing:
    https://www.facebook.com/wearevaxxed/videos/356795464667736/
  • VAERS records of 1,000+ babies under the age of 6 months that all died shortly after vaccinations. These are ONLY those 6 months & under. Sickening:
    http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?EVENTS=on&PAGENO=2&PERPAGE=10&ESORT=NONE&REVERSESORT=&LOWAGE=(0)&HIGHAGE=(0.5)&WhichAge=range&SYMPTOMS=(Sudden_infant_death_syndrome_%2810042440%29)
  • Identifying vaccine damage: 
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-andrew-moulden-learning-to-identify-vaccine-damage/
  • VAERS received 29,747 reports after Hib vaccines -- 5179 (17%) were serious, including 896 reports of death: 
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598306
  • Make sure to report reactions:
    http://www.nvic.org/reportreaction.aspx
  • US court pays $6 million to Gardasil victims:
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/.../us-court-pays-6.../
  • Gardasil & cervarix vaccine adverse reports:
http://sanevax.org/vaers-report
  • Journal of Developing Drugs - food allergies & vaccines: 
    http://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/evidence-that-food-proteins-in-vaccines-cause-the-development-of-foodallergies-and-its-implications-for-vaccine-policy-2329-6631-1000137.pdf
  • The AAP on  "Eczema Vaccinatum" (aka vaccines cause eczema): 
    http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/22/2/259
  • & another dead kid compensated:
    https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2010vv0103-145-0
  • 83 cases reviewed by lawyers:
    http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1681&context=pelr
  • Measles deaths vs MMR deaths 2004-2015:
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/zero-u-s-measles-deaths-in-10-years-but-over-100-measles-vaccine-deaths-reported/
  • DTaP, HIB, & chicken pox vaccines all list otitis media or parotitis on their inserts. This is what causes ear infections. You can find the inserts here:
    http://www.immunize.org/fda/
  • 7 out of 8 of the individuals that died from the flu in California received their flu shot: 
    https://healthfreedomidaho.org/7-of-the-8-individuals-who-died-of-flu-had-received-the-flu-shot
  • Hiding Vaccine-Related Deaths With Semantic Sleight-of-Hand:
    http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2271619-hiding-vaccine-related-deaths-with-semantic-sleight-of-hand/
Other-
  • Combating childhood disease naturally: 
    http://healthyfamiliesforgod.com/2015/02/combating-childhood-diseases-naturally-vaccines/
  • Unvaxx vs vaxx survey:
    http://www.vaccineinjury.info/survey/results-unvaccinated/results-illnesses.html
  • Where to start your research:
    https://thinklovehealthy.com/2016/11/02/researching-vaccines-where-to-start/
  • 10 things I want parents that vaccinate to know:
    http://holisticlifemama.com/10-things-want-parents-vaccinate-kids-know/
  • eBook over sanitation: 
    http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/pta%20vaccine%20book.pdf
  • Pediatricians get bonuses to push vaccines:
    https://wellnessandequality.com/2016/06/20/how-much-money-do-pediatricians-really-make-from-vaccines/
  • Does your doctor get incentives to push vaccines? Look them up:
    https://projects.propublica.org/docdollars/
  • Truth about the whooping cough:
    https://www.facebook.com/MyIncredibleOpinionWithForrestMaready/videos/1784935255163580/
  • Letter to legislators:
    http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/an-open-letter-to-legislators-currently-considering-vaccine-legislation-from-tetyana-obukhanych-phd-in-immunology/
  • Do not sign the refusal form:
    https://parentsaganinstmandatoryvaccines.net/2015/08/18/do-not-sign-the-refusal-to-vaccinate-form/
  • My child survived the chicken pox 😱:
    http://www.livingwhole.org/my-child-got-chicken-pox-and-survived/
  • CDC uses fear to push vaccines:
    http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2017/04/how-cdc-uses-false-fears-to-promote-vaccine-uptake/
  • NICU & vaccines:
    http://ipaknowledge.org/nicu.php
  • AAP refuses to back claims with science:
    https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/american-academy-pediatrics-refuses-back-vaccine-claims-science/
  • Stop the hate:
    http://www.livingwhole.org/the-hate-debate/
  • Vaccine warranty: 
    http://preventdisease.com/pdf/Warranty-of-Vaccine-Safety-English.pdf
  • Legal statement from the CDC scientist who admits to altering & omitting data to remove profound link between MMR & autism:
    http://morganverkamp.com/statement-of-william-w-thompson-ph-d-regarding-the-2004-article-examining-the-possibility-of-a-relationship-between-mmr-vaccine-and-autism/
  • Injection vs ingestion:
    https://livelovefruit.com/synergistic-toxicity-and-vaccine-safety/
  • Pertussis vaccine & pregnancy:
    http://kellybroganmd.com/pregnancy-friendly-protection-truth-about-whooping-cough-vaccine-pertussis/?utm_campaign=coschedule&utm_source=facebook_page&utm_medium=Kelly%20Brogan%20MD%20-%20Holistic%20Psychiatrist
  • Polio wasn't vanquished -- it was redefined:
    http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2015/07/polio-wasnt-vanquished-it-was-redefined/
  • Pertussis vaccine not very effective:
    https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/12/1730/452864/Unexpectedly-Limited-Durability-of-Immunity
  • Synagis (RSV shot):
    http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/the-scary-side-of-synagis/
  • WHO recommends vit A to treat the measles: 
    http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/
  • Germany Supreme Court says the measles virus "does not exist": 
    http://drsircus.com/general/mmr-vaccine-from-hell-court-rules-measles-is-not-caused-by-a-virus/
  • Dr. Suzanne Humphries recommends vit C for whooping cough: 
    http://drsuzanne.net/2015/04/the-vitamin-c-treatment-of-whooping-cough-suzanne-humphries-md/
  • Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes Clean, Warns Parents & Young Girls It’s All A Giant Deadly Scam (Dr Diane Harper):
    http://www.australiannationalreview.com/lead-developer.../
  • Japan pulled Gardasil from the schedule:
http://www.tokyotimes.com/side-effects-in-young-girls.../

  • 2009 Spain halts batch of Merck's Gardasil:
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSLA56308620090210

  • Vaccines & ear infections: 
    http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=15234
  • You can't protect another person from pertussis:
    https://leviquackenboss.wordpress.com/2016/02/19/you-cant-protect-another-person-from-pertussis/
  • Vaccines violate the Christian faith:
    http://www.alabasterliving.com/blog/do-vaccines-violate-the-christian-faith
    http://yournewswire.com/christian-bible-vaccines/
    http://www.nevermindthem.com/opinion/biblical-reasons-not-to-vaccinate.asp
    http://www.livingwhole.org/?s=God+does+not+support+vaccines
  • Yes, the CDC does recommend vaccinating but it also says that unmarried women are more likely to miscarry 🤦🏼‍♀️ : 
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_08.pdf
  • 12 CDC whistleblowers have came forward:
    https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/CDC_SPIDER_Letter-1.pdf
  • Vaccine safety: 
    http://icandecide.com/white-papers/VaccineSafety-Version-1.0-October-2-2017.pdf
  • Number of flu deaths is inaccurate: 
    http://www.bmj.com/content/331/7529/1412
  • Why you can’t compare aluminum in breastmilk to aluminum in vaccines:
    https://thinklovehealthy.com/2017/07/28/why-you-cannot-compare-the-amount-of-aluminum-in-breastmilk-to-vaccines-2/
  • All this research above....your doctor knows it right? Probably not.  Maybe in 17 years.:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1497798/
  • Letter to pregnant moms questioning vaccines:
    http://vaxtruth.org/2016/05/dear-pregnant-mom/
  • Health benefits of the measles:
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/unreported-health-benefits-measles
  • Vaccines - Unavoidably Unsafe:
    http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/unavoidably-unsafe/
  • Sharing vaccine truths with loved ones:
    http://journeyboost.com/2016/12/30/7-essentials-for-sharing-vaccine-truth-with-loved-ones/
  • Smoke, mirrors, & the disappearance of polio:
    http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2011/11/17/smoke-mirrors-and-the-disappearance-of-polio/
  • 154 of the last 162 cases of polio in the US were caused BY the oral polio vaccine:
    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/polio.html
  • MORE THAN ONE HALF OF ALL AMERICAN CHILDREN ARE CHRONICALLY SICK:
    http://fearlessparent.org/americas-new-normal-chronically-ill-kids/
  • 1 in 6 have Neurological Damage:
http://whale.to/vaccines/neurological.html

  • 50 Million Americans are being slowly killed by Autoimmune Diseases that didn't exist before the vaccine program started: 
    https://vaccineimpact.com/2012/autoimmune-disorders-caused-by-vaccines/
  • 30 million children have deadly food allergies that didn't exist before the vaccine program started: 
    https://therefusers.com/vaccines-cause-allergies-dr-dave-mihalovic/
  • ONE HALF OF ALL AMERICANS WILL GET CANCER IN THEIR LIFETIME AND IT'S THE LEADING KILLER OF CHILDREN UNDER 18 (1 in 100,000 got it before the vaccine program started.): 
    https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/551998
  • AT THE CURRENT TRAJECTORY, By 2025 ONE HALF OF all VACCINATED American kids will have a brain injury so profound they will never be able to speak, get out of diapers, or live on their own. By 2032-80% OF ALL MALE CHILDREN WILL BE AFFECTED!:
http://www.anh-usa.org/half-of-all-children-will-be-autistic-by-2025-warns-senior-research-scientist-at-mit/

Other Resources-
  • Stop Mandatory Vaccination: 
    http://www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com/personal-choice/
  • Learn the Risk:
    http://www.learntherisk.org/studies/
  • Watch this series:
    https://go.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/
  • & these movies:
http://vaxxedthemovie.com
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=K1m3TjokVU4
http://www.boughtmovie.com
http://thehumanexperimentmovie.com

  • https://www.infowars.com/search-page/
Tylenol-
  • Say no to Tylenol:
    http://naturopathicpediatrics.com/2013/07/15/just-say-no-to-tylenol-acetaminophen-causes-autism/
  • Tylenol depletes glutathione:
    http://whale.to/vaccine/tylenol_depletes_glutathione.html
  • Tylenol is NOT a pain reliever for infants: 
    http://www.newbeginningsbirthcenter.com/tylenol-no-longer-deemed-a-pain-reliever-for-babies-and-toddlers/
  • Tylenol is not safe:
    http://reset.me/story/could-a-common-painkiller-cause-brain-inflammation-and-even-autism-in-children/
  • Tylenol depletes the body of glutathione (people with autism lack glutathione):
    http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/530494
  • Why you should stop giving your kids Tylenol: 
    https://www.livingwhole.org/why-you-should-stop-giving-your-kids-tylenol/
  • What is the blood brain barrier?: 
    http://www.brainfacts.org/%E2%80%A6/articl%E2%80%A6/2014/blood-brain-barrier
  • Blood brain barrier maturity:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3314990/
  • What is glutathione?: 
    http://www.essentialgsh.com/glutathione.html
  • Tylenol depletes glutathione which is needed to detox: 
    http://www.whale.to/vaccine/tylenol
  • Stop giving Tylenol before/after vaccines: 
    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/study-avoid-tylenol-after-vaccinations/
  • Info on fevers: 
    http://www.seattlechildrens.org/medical-conditions/symptom-index/fever/
MTHFR-
  • MTHFR gene:
    http://www.healthhomeandhappiness.com/folate-vs-folic-acid-mthfr-and-why-i-regret-taking-my-prenatal-vitamin.html
  • Private testing: 
    https://www.drchad.net/mthfr-and-more-cheek-swab-genetic-test/ (they do not keep rights to your DNA & destroy your DNA after test is completed) 
  • https://m.youtube.com/watch?sns=fb&v=Y3NKG4qtWyk
  • http://www.easytolovebut.com/?p=2782
  • http://greensandgenes.blogspot.com/2012/11/lmthfr-genetic-mutation-and-associated.html?m=1
  • https://www.dietvsdisease.org/mthfr-c677t-a1298c-mutation/
  • http://mthfr.net/l-methylfolate-methylfolate-5-mthf/2012/04/05/
  • https://www.anabundantlife.com.au/mthfr-gene/
  • https://www.anabundantlife.com.au/mthfr-test/
  • https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-integrationist/201409/genetic-mutation-can-affect-mental-physical-health
  • https://www.anabundantlife.com.au/mthfr-folic-acid/
  • http://honestlyadhd.com/MTHFR-magical/
  • http://mthfr.net/nitrous-oxide-mthfr-trouble/2015/02/06/
  • http://www.merrittwellness.com/mthfr-mistakes-assumptions-dangers-and-whats-true-about-mthfr/
  • https://mthfrgenehealth.com/foods-bad-for-mthfr-poor-methylation/
Herd Immunity
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/02/18/the-deadly-impossibility-of-herd-immunity-through-vaccination-by-dr-russell-blaylock/

The term, ‘herd immunity’, was coined by researcher, A W Hedrich, after he’d studied the epidemiology of measles in USA between 1900-1931. His study published in the May, 1933 American Journal of Epidemiology concluded that when 68% of children younger than 15 yrs old had become immune to measles via infection, measles epidemics ceased. For several reasons, this natural, pre-vaccine herd immunity differed greatly from today’s vaccine ‘herd immunity’.1,2

When immunity was derived from natural infection, a much smaller proportion of the population needed to become immune to show the herd effect; compare the 68% measles immunity required for natural herd immunity to the very high percentages of vaccine uptake deemed necessary for measles vaccine ‘herd immunity’. In his ‘Vaccine Safety Manual’, Neil Z Miller cites research which concluded increasing vaccine uptake necessary for ‘herd immunity’ ranging from “70 to 80 percent of two year olds in inner cities” in 1991 to “‘close to 100 percent coverage’…with a vaccine that is 90 to 98 percent effective.” in 1997. Miller notes that, “When the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963, officials were confident that they could eradicate the disease by 1967.”

Subsequently, new dates for eradication were pronounced as 1982, 2000 and 2010. Meanwhile, “In 1990, after examining 320 scientific works from around the world, 180 European medical doctors concluded that ‘the eradication of measles…would today appear to be an unrealistic goal.’” And in 1984, Professor D. Levy of Johns Hopkins University had already “concluded that if current practices [of suppressing natural immunity] continue, by the year 2050 a large part of the population will be at risk and ‘there could in theory be over 25,000 fatal cases of measles in the U.S.A.’”

Disease-conferred immunity usually lasted a lifetime. As each new generation of children contracted the infection, the immunity of those previously infected was renewed due to their continual cyclical re-exposure to the disease; except for newly-infected children and the few individuals who’d never had the disease or been exposed to it, the ‘herd immunity’ of the entire population was maintained at all times.

Vaccine ‘herd immunity’ is hit-and-miss; outbreaks of disease sometimes erupt in those who follow recommended vaccine schedules. If they do actually “immunize”, vaccines provide only short-term immunity so, in an attempt to maintain ‘herd immunity’, health authorities hold ‘cattle drives’ to round up older members of the ‘herd’ for administration of booster shots. And on it goes, to the point that, now, it’s recommended we accept cradle-to-grave shots of vaccine against pertussis, a disease which still persists after more than sixty years of widespread use of the vaccine.

Russell Blaylock, MD remarks, “One of the grand lies of the vaccine program is the concept of “herd immunity”. In fact, vaccines for most Americans declined to non-protective levels within 5 to 10 years of the vaccines. This means that for the vast majority of Americans, as well as others in the developed world, herd immunity doesn’t exist and hasn’t for over 60 years.”3

In the pre-vaccine era, newborns could receive antibodies against infectious diseases from their mothers who had themselves been infected as children and re-exposed to the diseases later in life. Today’s babies born to mothers who were vaccinated and never exposed to these diseases do not receive these antibodies. In direct contrast to fear mongering disease “facts” and ‘herd immunity’ theories related by Public Health, most of today’s babies are more vulnerable than babies of the pre-vaccine era.

References:
1. “Monthly estimates of the child population ‘susceptible’ to measles, 1900-1931, Baltimore, Maryland”; A W Hedrich; American Journal of Epidemiology; May 1933 – Oxford University Press.

2. ‘Vaccine Safety Manual’ by Neil Z Miller; New Atlantean Press; 2008, 2009; pg 152.

3. Ibid; pgs 16-17.

https://www.facebook.com/axshlexy/posts/10154130529699126
"Q: Doesn't herd immunity protect most people?

A: Herd immunity (or community immunity) is a situation in which, through vaccination or prior illness, a sufficient proportion of a population is immune to an infectious disease, making its spread from person to person unlikely. Even individuals not vaccinated (such as newborns and those with chronic illnesses) are typically protected because the disease has little opportunity to spread within their community. Since pertussis spreads so easily, vaccine protection decreases over time, and acellular pertussis vaccines may not prevent colonization (carrying the bacteria in your body without getting sick) or spread of the bacteria, we can't rely on herd immunity to protect people from pertussis." <https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/about/faqs.html#increasing>

Questions to ask your doctor/ped regarding vaccinations:

Question-1: If measles vaccines confer measles immunity, then why do already-vaccinated children have anything to fear from a measles outbreak?

Question-2: If vaccines work so well, then why did Merck virologists file a False Claims Act with the U.S. government, describing the astonishing scientific fraud of how Merck faked its vaccine results to trick the FDA?

Question-3: If vaccines don’t have any links to autism, then why did a top CDC scientist openly confess to the CDC committing scientific fraud by selectively omitting clinical trial data after the fact in order to obscure an existing link between vaccines and autism?

Question-4: If mercury is a neurotoxic chemical, then why is it still being injected into children and pregnant women via vaccines? Why does the vaccine industry refuse to remove all the mercury from vaccines in the interests of protecting children from mercury?

Question-5: If vaccines are so incredibly safe, then why does the vaccine industry need absolute legal immunity from all harm caused by its products?

Question-6: If vaccines work so well to prevent disease, then why do some vaccines (like the chickenpox vaccine) openly admit that they can cause the spread of chickenpox?

Question-7: If vaccines are so great for public health, then why do these historical public health charts show nearly all the declines in infectious disease taking place BEFORE vaccines arrived on the scene?

Question-8: If vaccines are perfectly safe, then why did at least 13 people recently die in Italy after being vaccinated?

Question-9: If vaccines are so trustworthy, then why did a pro-vaccine group in Africa recently discover — to its shock and horror — that vaccines being given to young African women were secretly laced with abortion chemicals? 

Question-10: If vaccines are backed by solid science, then why do some vaccine inserts openly admit they are backed by no clinical trials?

Question-11: If vaccines are so safe, then why does this vaccine insert admit that the Gardasil vaccine causes “acute respiratory illness” in babies who consume the breast milk of mothers who have been vaccinated?

Question-12: If vaccines are so safe, then why does this Gardasil insert sheet admit that the vaccine causes “seizure-like activity, headache, fever, nausea and dizziness” and can even cause those injected with the vaccine to lose consciousness and fall, resulting in injury?

Question-13: If vaccines are backed by so much “science” then why do they frequently admit there really aren’t any studies of the vaccine for the very groups of people who are often injected with it?

Question-14: If vaccines are so safe to give to pregnant women, then why do the vaccine insert sheets openly admit most of them have never been tested for safety in pregnant women? In fact, this vaccine admits “the effects of the vaccine in foetal development are unknown.”Question-15: If vaccines are so safe to be injected into the bodies of children and pregnant women, then why do their own insert sheets readily admit they are manufactured with a cocktail of toxic chemical ingredients including “foetal bovine serum?” (The blood serum of aborted baby cows.)

Question-16: If vaccines achieve absolute immunity, then why are as many as 97 percent of children struck by infectious disease already vaccinated against that disease?

Question-17: If vaccines are totally safe and effective, then why did this five-year-old girl recently die from the very strain of flu she was just vaccinated against?

Question-18: If the mainstream media claims to report honest, unbiased information about vaccines, then why was there a total nationwide blackout on the news of the CDC whistle-blower admitting vaccines are linked to autism?

Doctors who explain clearly why vaccines aren't safe or effective.
1. Dr. Nancy Banks - http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm
2. Dr. Russell Blaylock - http://bit.ly/1BXxQZL
3. Dr. Shiv Chopra - http://bit.ly/1gdgh1s
4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny - http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx
5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries - http://bit.ly/17sKDbf
6. Dr. Larry Palevsky - http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6
7. Dr. Toni Bark - http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB
8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield - http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo
9. Dr. Meryl Nass - http://bit.ly/1DGzJsc
10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin - http://bit.ly/1G9ZXYl
11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot - http://bit.ly/1MrVeUL
12. Dr. Robert Rowen - http://bit.ly/1SIELeF
13. Dr. David Ayoub - http://bit.ly/1SIELve
14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD - http://bit.ly/1KsdVby
15. Dr. Rashid Buttar - http://bit.ly/1gWOkL6
16. Dr. Roby Mitchell - http://bit.ly/1gdgEZU
17. Dr. Ken Stoller - http://bit.ly/1MPVqLI
18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein - http://bit.ly/1LLEqHH
19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD - http://bit.ly/1OHbLDI
20. Dr. David Davis - http://bit.ly/1gdgJwo
21. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych - http://bit.ly/16Z7k6J
22. Dr. Harold E Buttram - http://bit.ly/1Kru6Df
23. Dr. Kelly Brogan - http://bit.ly/1D31pfQ
24. Dr. RC Tent - http://bit.ly/1MPVwmu
25. Dr. Rebecca Carley - http://bit.ly/K49F4d
26. Dr. Andrew Moulden - http://bit.ly/1fwzKJu
27. Dr. Jack Wolfson - http://bit.ly/1wtPHRA
28. Dr. Michael Elice - http://bit.ly/1KsdpKA
29. Dr. Terry Wahls - http://bit.ly/1gWOBhd
30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff - http://bit.ly/1OtWxAY
31. Dr. Paul Thomas - http://bit.ly/1DpeXPf
32. Many doctors talking at once - http://bit.ly/1MPVHOv
33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz - http://bit.ly/1OtWG7D
34. Dr. Jane Orient - http://bit.ly/1MXX7pb
35. Dr. Richard Deth - http://bit.ly/1GQDL10
36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic - http://bit.ly/1eqiPr5
37. Dr Chris Shaw - http://bit.ly/1IlGiBp
38. Dr. Susan McCreadie - http://bit.ly/1CqqN83
39. Dr. Mary Ann Block - http://bit.ly/1OHcyUX
40. Dr. David Brownstein - http://bit.ly/1EaHl9A
41. Dr. Jayne Donegan - http://bit.ly/1wOk4Zz
42. Dr. Troy Ross - http://bit.ly/1IlGlNH
43. Dr. Philip Incao - http://bit.ly/1ghE7sS
44. Dr. Joseph Mercola - http://bit.ly/18dE38I
45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet - http://bit.ly/1MaX0cC
46. Dr. Robert Mendelson - http://bit.ly/1JpAEQr
47. Dr Theresa Deisher https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=6Bc6WX33SuE
48. Dr. Sam Eggertsen-https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8LB-3xkeDAE
Hundreds more doctors testifying that vaccines aren't safe or effective, in these documentaries....
1. Vaccination - The Silent Epidemic - http://bit.ly/1vvQJ2W
2. The Greater Good - http://bit.ly/1icxh8j
3. Shots In The Dark - http://bit.ly/1ObtC8h
4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth - http://bit.ly/KEYDUh
5. Vaccine Nation - http://bit.ly/1iKNvpU
6. Vaccination - The Truth About Vaccines - http://bit.ly/1vlpwvU
7. Lethal Injection - http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ
8. Bought - http://bit.ly/1M7YSlr
9. Deadly Immunity - http://bit.ly/1KUg64Z
10. Autism - Made in the USA - http://bit.ly/1J8WQN5
11. Beyond Treason - http://bit.ly/1B7kmvt
12. Trace Amounts - http://bit.ly/1vAH3Hv 
13. Why We Don't Vaccinate - http://bit.ly/1KbXhuf
 

Vaccine injury payouts exceed $4 billion, yet most people remain uninformed about the risks linked to vaccinations

7/12/2018

 
Vaccine injury payouts exceed $4 billion, yet most people remain uninformed about the risks linked to vaccinations
Posted by: Dena Schmidt, staff writer in Drug Dangers, Vaccine Dangers December 1, 2018 48 Comments


(NaturalHealth365) Recent data from the Health Resources & Services Administration reveals some alarming information about vaccine side effects and the legal outcome of a vaccine injury.
Payouts from a vaccine injury compensation fund have now exceeded $4 billion, and this reflects the government’s own assessment that just one percent of all vaccine injuries are reported.
As we would expect: the pharmaceutical industry, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) plus many other ‘health’ organizations continue to insist that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ – despite the huge payouts issued by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).
There has never been a wider level of brainwashing throughout a society.  Too many uninformed citizens are being kept in the dark about the true risks associated with these vaccines.
The most disturbing reality linked to vaccine injury payouts
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) was launched by President Reagan in 1986 as an ‘alternative remedy’ to judicial action for vaccine injuries. A key component is the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) with its own “vaccine court.”
Within this system, consumers are required to meet an extremely high burden of proof to win their cases. Over its 30-year history, consumers have filed more than 20,000 petitions.
The result?  Less than one-third of these victims receive compensation, and since only about one percent of vaccine injury cases are reported, only a fraction of those affected by vaccine side effects ever receive monetary compensation for their pain.
While some victims do receive a legal victory, overall it seems like this program cares more about protecting the vaccine manufacturer.  If big pharma is not held accountable for its actions, why should they focus on making vaccines safer?
Despite horrific side effects: Vaccines get promoted, more than ever!
Meanwhile, the CDC childhood vaccine schedule guarantees a large and lucrative market for the pharmaceutical companies.  As you may know, there’s been a push – in recent years – to vaccinate teenagers with the HPV shot.
In addition, the highly ineffective flu vaccine is heavily marketed to people of all ages.
The source of many vaccine side effects has been linked to the toxic metals – which are included as so-called ‘necessary’ ingredients.  Many vaccines on the market today contain: aluminum, mercury and other ingredients that essentially function as neurotoxins – suppressing the immune system; leading to nervous system issues and cognitive problems.
Parents beware: children under the age of 3, in particular, receive these unsafe ingredients in amounts that far exceed acceptable levels.
The reason why vaccines cause problems like, autism and autoimmune disorders
According to ‘conventional wisdom,’ adults should not receive more than 25 micrograms (mcg) of aluminum at one time; infants or children – no more than 10 micrograms.  Yet, while adhering to a typical vaccine schedule, small children will be exposed to at least 250 mcg on their first day of life! (plus, much more before the age of 3)
In addition to neurological problems, autoimmune disorders and autism, many vaccine side effects include: chronic aches and pain, paralysis and even sudden premature death.  Regulatory agencies and the drug companies themselves need to start focusing on better ways to protect our society from disease.
Injecting neurotoxins into the human body is NOT ‘safe’ or ‘effective.’  It’s just wrong.
We, as concerned citizens, must educate ourselves and (always) make informed decisions about our healthcare.
Sources for this article include:
ChildrensHealthDefense.org
NaturalHealth365.com
https://www.naturalhealth365.com/vaccine-injury-2788.html
 

Science fact or fiction? NHMRC admits they did not use accepted scientific methods

22/9/2018

 

Independent researchers have shares in drug companies they're testing!

17/9/2018

 
'Independent' researchers have shares in drug companies they're testing
About the author: 
Bryan Hubbard - an article of WDDTY
You can read this article directly on https://www.wddty.com/news/2018/09/independent-researchers-have-shares-in-drug-companies-theyre-testing.html
September 14th 2018 in Cancer, Drugs

Independent drug trials aren't always quite so independent. Researchers are still not revealing the pay-outs they're getting from drug companies whose drugs they are testing—and in some cases they even have shares in the company.
Around a third of researchers are not disclosing their financial conflicts of interest despite the enormous pressure from medical journals for transparency in clinical trials.
Some researchers get speaking fees, others receive 'research grants' and others hold shares in the drug company whose drug they are reviewing, but which they are not revealing in their research that is presented as being independent.
A review of the work of 344 cancer researchers discovered they had received a total of $216m in payments from drug companies in just over a year—and which they had never disclosed.
But they are under no obligation to reveal their connection to the drug company. "It's an honour system. The journals ask the authors to make these disclosures, but there's no legal force behind it," said Erick Turner of the Oregon Health & Science University.
He and his researchers looked at the Open Payments Database, a US system where all drug company pay-outs are supposed to be recorded, and compared them to the disclosures made in published clinical trials of cancer drugs.
It's known that drug company pay-outs influence doctors in their prescribing decisions, and the researchers are concerned the same could also be true for scientists conducting clinical trials.


References
(Source: JAMA Oncology, 2018; doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3738)

Release the first report!

14/9/2018

 
BackgroundThe Australian Government research Institute, NHMRC, made headlines with their 2015 report declaring Homeopathy to be ineffective for any condition. What NHMRC never told anyone was that the report they published was not their original findings. It was a SECOND attempt. The FIRST report they produced was completely buried. Then they did the whole thing again and published the SECOND report.
Join the growing number of people around the world calling for the NHMRC to release the FIRST report. 
Read the full story and sign the petition on this web site : https://releasethefirstreport.com/


Homeopathy: No better than placebo?In March 2015, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) published an Information Paper on homeopathy, commonly referred to as ‘The Australian Report’, essentially declaring homeopathy to be no better than placebo.
This document concludes that “…there are no health conditions for which there is reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective”.
This report triggered headlines around the world falsely suggesting NHMRC had found that homeopathy doesn’t work for any condition, and was simply a placebo.
However, it wasn’t until after the report had been released, and headlines generated, that the alarming flaws in NHMRC’s approach to the Homeopathy review were brought to light. The most serious scientific breach… NHMRC did the review twice, only publishing their second attempt.
  • The NHMRC did the homeopathy review twice, producing two reports, one in July 2012 and the one released to the public in March 2015.
  • The existence of the first report was never disclosed to the public, and knowledge of it being carried out has only been revealed through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.
  • NHMRC say they rejected the first report because it was poor quality despite it being undertaken by a reputable scientist and author of NHMRC’s own guidelines on how to conduct evidence reviews.
  • FOI requests revealed that a member of NHMRC’s expert committee overseeing the review process – Professor Fred Mendelsohn – confirmed the missing report to be high quality saying, “I am impressed by the rigor, thoroughness and systematic approach given to this evaluation [….] Overall, a lot of excellent work has gone into this review and the results are presented in a systematic, unbiased and convincing manner.”

The Missing Report“I am impressed by the rigor, thoroughness and systematic approach given to this evaluation [….] Overall, a lot of excellent work has gone into this review and the results are presented in a systematic, unbiased and convincing manner.”
Prof Fred Mendelsohn
Member of NHMRC’s Expert Committee


The missing first report
NHMRC’s investigation into Homeopathy ran from 2010 to 2015, aiming to review the evidence on homeopathy to inform the Australian public.
NHMRC worked with an external contractor – a respected Australian University – from April 2012 to August 2012. The report they produced was called ‘A Systematic Review of the Evidence on the Effectiveness of Homeopathy’.
This review, paid for by Australian tax payers, was never made public and NHMRC continues to refuse to release it, despite repeated Freedom of Information requests. After terminating the contract with the Australian University, a second external contractor – OptumInsight – was hired to do the Homeopathy review again from December 2012-March 2015.
Second time lucky?Having binned the first report, the second time around NHMRC invented a completely new way of analysing the evidence which has never been used before by any research team in the world.
NHMRC decided that for trials to be ‘reliable’ they had to have at least 150 participants and reach an unusually high threshold for quality. This is despite the fact that NHMRC itself routinely conducts studies with less than 150 participants.
These unprecedented and unscientific rules meant the results of 171 of the trials were completely disregarded as being ‘unreliable’, leaving only 5 trials NHMRC considered to be ‘reliable’. As they assessed all 5 of these trials as negative, this explains how NHMRC could conclude that there was no ‘reliable’ evidence, and falsely justify claims that homeopathy is no more than a placebo.


Why?NHMRC are world experts in reviewing evidence, conducting reviews as a matter of routine.
So, if there is truly no reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective for any condition, wouldn’t they have got this result just by conducting the review once, in the usual way, using a standard widely-accepted scientific method. One has to ask:
  • Why do it twice?
  • Why remove all traces of the first report?
  • Why invent a method even NHMRC has never used for any other review, ever?
  • What are they trying to hide?






What can we do?The disturbing story of the Australian Report suggests that, contrary to the insistence of anti-homeopathy ‘skeptic’ groups and many media stories, there isreliable positive evidence that homeopathy works for some medical conditions, which is not being reported to the public.
As homeopathy continues to grow in popularity globally, the public needs to know what evidence exists for this treatment, so they can make informed choices about their healthcare.
An Ombudsman challenge is currently in progress, requiring NHMRC to answer charges of scientific misconduct, procedural breaches, bias and conflict of interest. It is great to see democracy in action, holding NHMRC to account, but in the meantime the Australian Report continues to do unfair damage to the sector.
This is why the public needs to see the first review. To fully understand the Australian Report that is having such a profound impact around the world, we need to see what answers they got the first time they did it.
Demand that NHMRC RELEASE THE FIRST REPORT. 


For a full breakdown of the flaws in NHMRC’s Report on Homeopathy, take a look at the analysis carried out by the Homeopathy Research Institute.

German footballers love homeopathy!

7/5/2018

 
German footballers love homeopathy
A survey of the German football league revealed homeopathy was used extensively with good effect by medical officers in the 1st and 2nd divisions.
Ninety-two per cent of teams treated players homeopathically; the therapy was seen as having definite advantages over other treatments.
Doctors and teams used homeopathy because it reduced the stress of exertion, produced faster recovery from injury, didn’t cause harmful side effects, was safe to use with other medical treatments, didn’t produce ‘doping’ infringements, and generally benefited the athletes.
More Information: Homeopathy and football: EM professionals rely on gentle medicine
https://homeopathyplus.com/german-football-teams-love-homeopathy/
http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/homoeopathie-und-fussball-em-profis-setzen-auf-sanfte-medizin-a-556276.html

Heartburn Pills Increase Risk Of Premature Death

6/7/2017

 
Heartburn pills increase risk of premature death
About the author: Bryan Hubbard
An article of WDDTY to read on : https://wddty.com/news/2017/07/heartburn-pills-increase-risk-of-premature-death.html
July 5th 2017 in Drugs, Indigestion
                   
 

People regularly pop a heartburn pill for indigestion—and some take one every day after a meal—but the drugs are far from safe. The drugs, known as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), increase the risk of premature death, a new study has discovered.
People who take the drug regularly for a year or longer raise their risk of dying prematurely by 25 per cent, researchers from the Washington University School of Medicine have discovered.
In other words, two people out of a thousand taking a PPI will die as a direct result of the drug. As more than 50 million prescriptions for the drug are written every year in the UK alone to treat problems such as ulcers, heartburn and gastro-intestinal problems, this suggests that a PPI could be responsible for many thousands of unexplained deaths. The drugs are also available over-the-counter in pharmacies and without a prescription.
It's already known that the drugs cause serious kidney damage, fractures and even dementia, and now sudden and premature death needs to be added to the list.
"People have the idea that PPIs are very safe because they are readily available, but there are real risks to taking the drugs, particularly for long periods of time," said lead researcher Ziyad Al-Aly.
His research team made their discovery when they compared the medical records of around 275,000 PPI users against those of 75,000 patients who were taking H2 blockers, another class of drugs that is also designed to reduce heartburn.
The drugs are supposed to be taken for relatively short periods, and certainly not for more than a couple of months, but many people take them every day for years as part of their daily regime, and often after a meal.
Although the over-the-counter versions of the drugs are not as strong as the prescription variety, they still contain the same compounds, and there's no way to monitor how long or often people are taking them.


References
(Source: BMJ Open, 2017; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015735)

A healthy gut can reverse autism

22/6/2017

 
A healthy gut can reverse autism, major study finds
About the author: Bryan Hubbard
https://wddty.com/news/2017/06/a-healthy-gut-can-reverse-autism-major-study-finds.html
June 22nd 2017 in Autism, Constipation
                   
 

It's nothing to do with the brain—autism can be checked and even reversed by focusing on the gut, a major review has concluded.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often starts when the gut is compromised—such as from toxins or antibiotics—which causes an imbalance between 'good' and 'bad' bacteria.
The imbalance makes the gut lining more permeable, and toxins, and even undigested foods, can get into the bloodstream and to the brain.
Many environmental factors can compromise the gut, from antibiotics to the health of the mother, and the length of time a baby was breastfed, said Dr Qinrui Li if Peking University in China, whose team reviewed more than 150 papers.
The conclusion is borne out by the experiences of many autistic children, who often complain of gut problems, such as diarrhea, constipation or flatulence.
But the cause also holds the key to a solution, he says. Restoring the gut microbiota can also go a long way to reversing the problem, and taking probiotics, prebiotics, or changing the diet to one that is gluten- and casein-free had a positive impact on symptoms.
Introducing these dietary changes improved sociability, reduced repetitive behaviour and enhanced social communication.
Dr Li described the findings as a "breakthrough" in autism treatment.


References
(Source: Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 2017; 11: doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00120
 

    Auteur

    Nathalie Parmentier Ingenieur (ir) with a Master of Science
    Classic Homeopath and Orthomolecular Therapist

    Archieven

    September 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    May 2018
    July 2017
    June 2017

    Categorieën

    All

    RSS Feed

Picture
The Power of Nature -
Homeopathy Cures You

ir Nathalie Parmentier MSc
Classic Homeopath and Orthomolecular Therapist
Advice in food and food supplements : plants, vitamines, minerals, probiotics and others

Make an appointment or ask for more information per email on info@power-of-nature.nl

Clinic and therapist officially recognized and linked to the NWP and RBCZ

Consultations (partly) reimbursed by medical insurance

KvK 53126602
Copyright 2022

Send me a message to make an appointment
Behandelvoorwaarden en praktijkinformatie
Picture